Participants complete a one‑page canvas that names interests, hypotheses, alternatives, deal breakers, and potential trades. We stress calculating a realistic BATNA, not just declaring one, by modeling timelines, switching costs, and stakeholder impact. The canvas travels into the lab as a living artifact, updated after each round to show how new information shifts leverage and priorities. Templates are yours to keep and adapt.
Listening is trained, not assumed. Drills include reflective summaries, labeling emotions without judgment, and testing assumptions with open questions. We demonstrate how a respectful silence after a tough ask invites elaboration that reveals true constraints. Participants practice naming the other side’s narrative before advocating their own, reducing defensiveness and unlocking options. These moves feel simple, yet repeatedly change numbers, timelines, and trust inside demanding deals.
Closing is not a victory lap; it is an alignment test. We practice crisp recaps, conditional language for unresolved items, and written confirmations that prevent drift. Participants rehearse how to push back on last‑minute scope creep without souring momentum. Post‑deal debriefs capture what worked, what did not, and which signals appeared earlier than noticed. This habit compounds learning and stabilizes execution during transitions across teams.